Today’s Post
Last week we took a relook at the insights of Teilhard de Chardin, extracting seven principles which we will employ as we move on to reinterpreting religious teaching for their relevance to human life. This week we will look at principles from other sources.
The Reinterpretation Principles from Maurice Blondel
As we discussed in the post of May 26, In his book, Man Becoming, Gregory Baum describes the work of Maurice Blondel in reinterpreting the traditional teachings of Christianity. In summary, Blondel saw the Catholic Church’s approach to theology as becoming less and less relevant to human life. Blondel was one of the first Catholic theologians to call for ‘reinterpreting’ church teachings, and in doing so proposed several ‘Priniciples of Reinterpretation’. Some of these are:
– Since we cannot know ‘God as He is apart from man’, we must understand that each statement that we make about God carries with it an implied assumption about humans and the reality in which they live. By seeking that implied assumption, we can reinterpret a teaching in terms of our lives.
The Principle: “‘Every sentence about God can be translated into a declaration about human life”
– As Teilhard was later to expand upon, the energies of evolution which have effected ‘Man’s Becoming’ continue to be active in his continued personal evolution. The onset of complexity that began in the ‘Big Bang’ continues to be present in human life and manifests itself in our potential for increased understanding and becoming. Most religious teachings seek to put us in touch with this current of energy by which we grow.
The Principle: “There is no standpoint from which a human person can say, “I am here and God is there”. The presence of God is an essential agent in his saying of it”.
The Principle: “(Religious teaching) is not a message added to our life from without; it is rather the clarification and specification of the transcendent mystery of humanization that is fundamentally operative in our life.”
– Any teaching must be relevant to be able to have an effect on our lives.
The Principle: “A message that comes to man wholly from the outside, without an inner relationship to his life, must appear to him as irrelevant, unworthy of attention and unassimilable by the mind”
The Principle: “Man cannot accept an idea as true unless it corresponds in some way to a question present in his mind”
– Our response to reality is a factor in our personal growth
The Principle: “A person is not a determined being, defined as it were by its nature. A person comes to be, in part at least, through his own responses to reality.”
Reinterpretation Principles From Karen Armstrong
– In keeping with Blondel’s insistence on elements of value in religious teaching, Karen Armstrong also offers a principle for reinterpretation
The Principle: “Instead of jettisoning religious doctrines, we should look for their spiritual kernel. A religious teaching is never simply a statement of objective fact: it is a program for action.”
– Echoing both Teilhard and Blondel, she addresses attempts to make sense of God on human terms, which can introduce anthromorphism into the concept of God. She agrees with the Eastern approach to understanding God differently.
The Principle: “It was unhelpful to be dogmatic about a transcendence that was essentially undefinable”
Reinterpretation Principle From Jonathan Sacks
– All religions contain dualisms that undermine their ability to map the road to human growth.
The Principle: “Any teaching that departs from the underlying unity of the universe will be detrimental to successful application to human life”
Reinterpretation Principle from Richard Rohr
– Good religion always acts as a unifying principle in our lives
The Principle: “Whatever reconnects (re-religio) our parts to the Whole is an experience of God, whether we call it that or not.”
An Overarching Principle
– And finally, a principle which is echoed by each of these thinkers:
The Principle: ”The underlying truth of a teaching, and the key to its relevancy, can be found in its power to bring opposing points of view into a cohesive whole”
The Next Post
This week we completed our collection of ‘principles of interpretation’, eighteen principles that we will use in the final section of this blog as we examine the precepts, concepts and teachings of Western religion for their relevancy to human life. It should be noted that in keeping with the subject of this blog, “The Secular Side of God”, these principles are not derived from traditional religious thought. They are general principles, secular in nature, which can be applied to religious thought.
Next week we will begin our inquiry by addressing the basic cornerstone of all religions, the fundamental ground of being which underlays the universe: God.