Posturing life to be more open to the forces of evolution which can bring us to ‘fuller being’
Today’s Post
Last week we saw how Teilhard’s ‘spiral of evolution’ depicts the process by which the rudimentary elements described by physics reciprocally unite, complexify and re-unite as evolution rises in the universe.
This week we continue our focus on universal evolution to address how it continues in human life.
The Noosphere as the Catalyst to Human Evolution
Teilhard offers a second venue for such reciprocation with his concept of the ‘noosphere’ (February 11). In its more common understanding, the noosphere is simply the aggregation of human lore, innovations built up over centuries of human cultural evolution.
But to Teilhard (and to some extent, Richard Dawkins in his concept of accumulated ‘memes’) the noosphere not only exists as a passive ‘bank of ideas’ but as an active agent in human evolution. Along with the treasure trove of technology that it provides, increasing the individual and collective welfare of our societies, it is the underlying and ever clarifying quantum of guideposts to our behavior. As Johan Norberg notes, while the innovations and inventions we have seen clearly contribute to our increasing welfare, they are not possible without the cultural insistence on the importance of the human person and the betterment of human relationships.
Thus, the noosphere, as Teilhard sees it, is a key reciprocal agent to our evolution. As we better understand ourselves and enhance our relationships, we contribute these insights into a collective wisdom that increases our capacity for a clearer understanding that will continue to further our personal as well as our cultural evolution.
Thus, we are back to the chicken-egg conundrum proposed by Sacks last week. Do we act because we evolve, or do our actions cause us to evolve? Considering the universal convergence that Teilhard sees in the noosphere, the answer is ‘yes’. The actions of generations of Westerners, demanding more freedom by way of many cycles of ‘charters’ and ‘constitutions’ has contributed cultural ‘DNA’ to an evolutionary process resulting in a society in which increased freedom leads to increased welfare. While Sacks’ connection between action and neurology might not be strongly suggested here, there seems to be little doubt that the world today (as Norberg documents in posts from Feb 20, 2020 ) is strikingly different from that experienced only a few generations ago. Actions can lead to consequences which enable further actions.
But the question still remains: how do we keep this recursive cycle going? How do we assure a future in which the unprecedented progress documented by Norberg will continue? Put another way, what is required at the unique granularity of the human person to foster the increasing convergence of the aggregate species in such a way that our personal and collective growth to ‘fuller being’ is ensured?
Values and Virtues as ‘Training for the Future’
We saw in the posts beginning April 8, 2021, how Paul masterfully summarizes what Jefferson refers to as “The Morals of Jesus”. To some extent, Paul addresses Richard Dawkins’ ‘de-baggaging’ of the gospels in his summaries of Jesus’ precepts. Focusing less on the ‘Stories of Jesus’ found in the gospels, Paul extracts and summarizes the teachings themselves into such lists as the three ‘Theological Virtues’ the eight examples of the ‘Fruit of the Spirit”..
One of his metaphors is the admonition to “Put on Christ”. A traditional interpretation is to understand such an action as ‘armoring’ one’s self against unbelievers, but a more direct interpretation is simply to see Jesus as a model for correct behavior. Of course, the rationale for ‘correct behavior’ as evolved in Western Christianity has traditionally been satisfying God’s criteria for ‘salvation’ as promotion into the next life. From Teilhard’s insight, however, ‘correct behavior’ involves that which positions us for ‘closer union through fuller being, and fuller being through closer union’, the two essential steps of both human evolution and personal growth.
We saw in the above reference how Paul’s concepts of the ‘Theological Virtues’ and the ‘Fruit of the Spirit’ translate easily into the insights of Teilhard as aspects of human evolution. We can do likewise as we explore situating ourselves more securely into the ‘tree of evolution’.
We have suggested frequently that a necessary aspect of human evolution is developing the skill of using the neocortex brain to modulate the instinctual stimuli of the ‘lower’ reptilian and limbic brains, and further learning to use the two (left and right) thinking modes of the neocortex harmoniously in dealing with reality. As we saw last week, Sacks observes how the performance of skills such as writing sharpens our mental ability to think more clearly. This reflects one of the most common adages in history, ‘Practice makes Perfect”. Athletes train, scholars and linguists memorize, children are taught to read, pilots train in simulators. All anticipate an increase in the skills to which they train.
We have seen how Paul’s eight facets of the ‘Fruit of the Spirit’ can be understood as facets of the ‘happiness’ that is possible as we move toward Jesus’ ‘fuller being’. They can also be seen as both aspects of behavior which reflect an inner maturity and acts of ‘training’ which can lead to the ‘fuller being’ that Jesus suggests is possible for us. As in all ‘training’, repetition of an action expands our ability to act. Thus, when Paul tells us to “Put on Christ”, he suggests that acting out the behavior that he identifies as resulting from ‘an indwelling of the spirit’ will lead to the ‘fullness of being’ in which these facets can be found.
The Next Post
This week we moved from an approach to understanding evolution as it proceeds in the universe to looking at its traces on human existence. As Teilhard suggests (and echoed by Haught and others) a rising awareness of this phenomenon in our personal lives is not only critical to the quality of life, but also to the continuation of our species.
Next week we will continue this approach to see how Paul’s insights into such aspects of human life are echoed in today’s psychology.